Apex Law Journal
Apex Law Journal
An online law journal reporting latest and important judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India.                                                                                                                         Click here to get free legal updates via email                                                                                                                          Click here to download forms (Address Form, List Of Documents and Memorandum Of Appearance)
User Name :
Password :
New Subscriber
Forgot Password


Neha Goel, Advocate

Advisory Board

S.C. Khunger, Advocate

Rohit Bansal, Advocate

Varinder Singh Kanwar, Advocate

Hittan Nehra, Advocate

Judgments on Arbitrator

Thursday, December 03, 2009

Arbitrator — Appointment of — Legislature has repeatedly laid emphasis on the necessity of adherence to the terms of agreement between the parties in the matter of appointment of arbitrators and procedure to be followed for such appointment. 

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Arbitrator — Once the arbitrator has construed a clause in a arbitration agreement in a particular manner, and such construction is not absurd and appears to be plausible, it is not open to the courts to interfere with the award of the arbitrator — Legal position is no more res integra that the arbitrator having been made the final arbiter of resolution of disputes between the parties, the award is not open to challenge on the ground that arbitrator has reached at a wrong conclusion — The courts do not interfere with the conclusion of the arbitrator even with regard to construction of a contract, if it is a possible view of the matter.

Monday, September 14, 2009

Arbitrator — Freedom to change the number of arbitrator — Held, parties have freedom to change the number of arbitrator even after the contract has been entered and by mutual consent the parties may amend the contract.  

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Arbitrator — Award passed by the arbitrator set aside by the Supreme Court — An arbitrator was appointed by the Supreme Court while setting aside the award particularly in view of the fact that construction of the contract was in question — Held, the Court did not and could not retain any control over the proceedings of the arbitrator.

Act Topic
Rule Citation
Free Text Search
Follow us on :
(Best view with 1024x768 Resolution)
© All rights including Copyrights and rights of translations etc, reserved and vested exclusively with Deepak Publications. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronics, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in any retrival system of any nature without the written permission of the copyright owner.

By using this site, you (and any entity on whose behalf your are acting) are consenting to be bound by Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy & Disclaimer Clause.